AI Testing Services - Agentic QA

QA that thinks.
Tests. Fixes itself.

We don't just automate test cases - we build AI testing agents that understand your application, adapt to unpredictable outputs, and validate at a scale no human team can match. This is what AI-powered software testing looks like when it is built for production.

Traditional QA assumes you know the expected output.

AI-powered applications don't work that way.

Agentic QA is how you test software that thinks.

Four things we've actually built,
not things we plan to.

AIAgentOUTPUT???CLAUDEValidatorAGENT✓ ValidatedAI JUDGING AI
Accomplishment 01, Agent Response Validation

When your AI's output can't be predicted, rule-based testing fails. We built AI that judges AI.

The Challenge

AI agents generate recommendations based on complex, multi-variable calculations. There's no single correct answer, the same input can produce legitimately different outputs depending on upstream context, user state, and model behaviour. Traditional assertion-based test automation always breaks here. You can't write `expect(output).toBe(x)` when `x` is an intelligent inference.

What We Built

A two-agent setup using the Anthropic API where a primary Claude-powered agent generates financial or analytical recommendations, and a second validator agent semantically evaluates those outputs for correctness, coherence, and domain compliance, without any hardcoded expected values. The validator uses a structured rubric built into its system prompt and returns a scored assessment with reasoning.

The Result

2,000+ flows validated using this setup

Claude AgentsAnthropic APIStructured Outputs
provassure.com96Perf94A11y100Best98SEOAUTONOMOUS PAGE AUDIT
Accomplishment 02, Page Performance Validation

Every page. Every metric. Zero manual effort.

The Challenge

Performance audits are run manually, inconsistently, and almost always only on the homepage. The remaining 40 pages of an application accumulate undetected regressions in Core Web Vitals, accessibility scores, and SEO signals, and teams only discover the damage when Google Search Console flags a drop or a user with assistive technology files a complaint.

What We Built

An agent that autonomously maps an application's route structure, generates navigation flows using AI-inferred logic (no pre-written scripts), visits each page, and invokes the Lighthouse API to capture Performance, Accessibility, Best Practices, and SEO scores. Results are compiled into a structured report with regressions flagged and delta-scored against a baseline, runnable on every deployment.

The Result

Full-application Lighthouse audit with zero manual test scripts

Lighthouse APIAI NavigationPlaywright
STARTAuth ModulePayment FlowsDashboard LogicPARALLEL EXECUTION
Accomplishment 03, Functional Testing with Agents

Functional testing that runs itself.

The Challenge

A human QA team tests features sequentially, one engineer, one flow, one module at a time. Parallelizing manual testing requires more headcount. For an application with 30+ distinct modules and weekly releases, full sprint coverage is either impossible or it blocks the release cycle.

What We Built

Agents built with Claude Cowork and Claude Code that ingest application context, codebase, documentation, API contracts, and autonomously decompose the test surface into independent modules. The agent then creates parallel testing jobs and executes functional tests across different parts of the application simultaneously, collating defects into a unified structured log with reproduction steps, severity, and module attribution.

The Result

Parallel coverage across entire application within a single sprint

Claude CoworkClaude CodeParallel Execution
checkout.spec.ts0102AI-gen ✦0304AI-gen ✦0506AI-gen ✦07AI-GENERATED TEST CODE
Accomplishment 04, Agentic Test Automation

10X faster automation. Self-healing tests. No more flaky nightmares.

The Challenge

Writing automation test cases is slow, requires dedicated engineers, and produces brittle suites that break with every UI change. Flaky tests caused by dynamic selectors, race conditions, and inconsistent test data burn more maintenance time than they save. Most teams end up with half-maintained automation that the team doesn't trust.

What We Built

An AI-assisted automation pipeline using Cursor, Antigravity, Claude Code, and VS Code Copilot that reads application source code and generates test cases contextually. Flaky tests are automatically detected and refactored. Classical automation problems, dynamic waits, resilient selector strategies, test data generation, are solved on the fly by the agent rather than manually by an engineer. Test case generation runs 10X faster than traditional authoring.

The Result

10X faster test generation, self-healing selectors, zero flaky tests

CursorAntigravityClaude CodeVS Code Copilot
Why this matters

Numbers from production systems.

2,000+

Flows validated autonomously

AI agents validating AI agent outputs, no human reviewer

10X

Faster test automation

AI-generated test cases vs. manual authoring by engineers

Zero

Manual scripts for performance audits

Full Lighthouse coverage across every page, every deploy

Tools we use in production.

Not a vendor logo parade, these are the specific tools behind the four accomplishments above.

AI Agents

ClaudeAnthropic APIStructured OutputsClaude Cowork

Performance

Lighthouse APIPlaywrightCore Web VitalsLocustJMeterBlazeMeter

Automation

CursorAntigravityClaude CodeVS Code CopilotSeleniumPlaywrightaxiosRestAssured

Functional

Claude CodeClaude CoworkParallel ExecutionClaude ExtensionLLM Wiki

Want to see Agentic QA in action?

We'll walk you through a live demo of one of these setups, no slides, no decks. Just the system running.

Book a technical demo →